The following is a guide to the State Environmental
Planning Policy- Exempt and Complying Development Codes 2008: Part 3 General
Housing Code (referred to as “the SEPP”).
This information is a guide only and shall not be relied upon solely. Please discuss
with your relevant consultant or local Council for advice specific to your
situation.
Before commencing
even an initial concept design it must be established whether the subject lot
is excluded from the SEPP. The surest and simplest method is to purchase a
“Planning Certificate” (known as a Section 149 Certificate). Within this
Certificate will be a statement akin to:
The above statement
confirms that the land subject of this Certificate is not excluded from the SEPP and as such a Complying
Development approval under Part 3: General Housing Code may be applied for.
Once it has been established that the
lot is subject to the SEPP, you must then determine whether the lots zoning is appropriate.
For the SEPP to apply the lot must be zoned R1, R2, R3, R4 or RU5. Unless the
Council is working under a Standard
Local Environmental Plan (LEP), the zoning for the lot may be referred to as
another equivalent zone other than R1, R2, R3, R4 or RU5. To establish that
this equivalent zone is in fact R1, R2, R3, R4 or RU5 you must refer to the
applicable Council’s Equivalent Zoning Table. These tables were created by the
Department of Planning and Infrastructure, they correlate between the zones,
permitting you to confirm whether the lots zoning is as required by the SEPP.
The tables may be accessed via this link; an example of a table (for Pittwater
Council) is below.
Using the above table we can determine
that land zoned 2(a) RESIDENTIAL A by Pittwater Council’s LEP of 1993, is the
equivalent of R2 – LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, as such lots within Pittwater
Council with zoning 2(a) RESIDENTIAL A are subject to the SEPP.
After you have established that the
subject lots zoning does not preclude it from the SEPP, you must then assess
the size and shape of the land against the requirements of the SEPP. For the
SEPP to apply the land must be at least 200sqm and be at least 6m wide measured
at the building line. The building
line is defined for the purposes of the SEPP as:
building
line means
the line of an existing or proposed external wall or roof edge of a building
(other than a wall or roof of any building element within an articulation
zone), or the outside face of any existing or proposed ancillary development,
closest to a boundary of a lot.
If the subject lot is a battle-axe
allotment then the lot must be serviced by an access laneway not less than 3m
wide and the lot measure not less than 12m x 12m (excluding the access
laneway).
If the lot has been assessed against
all stated above and it has been determined that the lot is in fact subject to
the SEPP, then an initial concept design can begin.
When working with the SEPP it is crucial that you apply the
definitions listed in Part 1 of the SEPP, for
example an attached deck is defined for the purposes of the SEPP as ancillary
development, while a detached deck is defined for the purposes of the SEPP as
an outbuilding. The development standards for an ancillary development as
opposed to an outbuilding are different. And if inadvertently designed to
comply with the wrong development standards the application will not comply and
be refused.
So you must identify that
which is to be included within the application and confirm what the structure
is defined as for the purposes of the SEPP and confirm that the structure may
be constructed as Complying Development. For example: a new 2 storey dwelling
with a swimming pool, cabana and detached carport.
Proposed
works:
|
Defined as:
|
Is it complying development?
|
2 storey dwelling
|
Dwelling house
|
Yes: Part 3
General housing code
|
swimming pool
|
Ancillary
development
|
Yes: Part 3
General housing code
|
cabana
|
Outbuilding
|
NO: This
particular Cabana is exempt development, as cabana is not higher than 3m,
900mm from lot boundaries, less than 20sqm (complies with Clause 2.17 &
2.18 of Part 2 Exempt Development Codes)
|
detached carport
|
Outbuilding
|
Yes: Part 3
General housing code (Note: Floor area of carport greater than that permitted
under Part 2 Exempt Development Codes)
|
In the above example, we have
confirmed that a new 2-storey dwelling is considered Complying Development
under Part 3 General Housing Code, likewise the proposed swimming pool &
detached carport. The Cabana however is not Complying Development as it may be
constructed as Exempt Development under Part 2 of the SEPP. This being the case
the cabana cannot form part of the Complying Development application, it may be
shown on the plans but must be noted as being constructed as exempt development
and the appropriate dimensions shown confirming the proposed structure is in
fact exempt development.
Now that it is clear what development
standards apply to what structures it is a matter of reviewing each applicable
clause within the SEPP. A layout such as the example
below can be useful to ensure all applicable clauses are considered and
complied with.
Once you have completed your design and determined that the design complies with all applicable clauses of the SEPP, you must then demonstrate compliance with the SEPP. This is best achieved with tables and hatching on the plans. For example a simple table such as:
The above table, when correlated with the proposed works, demonstrates compliance in an efficient manner. By applying to the plans a table such as this you are demonstrating compliance with the SEPP to anyone interested in ensuring that the proposed works do in fact comply.
Once you are confident that your
application complies with the applicable clauses of the SEPP, please forward a
copy of your plans to Insight Building Certifiers ‘the complying development specialists’ so we may provide you a fee
proposal for the assessment and issuing of your Complying Development
Certificate.
If you have any questions regarding
the above or Complying Development in general please contact Insight Building
Certifiers on 9999 0003 or info@insightcert.com.au
I have received conflicting comments about "the building line". Blue Mountains City Council has twice stated that it is the front WALL of the house but this article states 'the roof edge of the buiding'. Can someone PLEASE provide advice. The house was built in 2015.
ReplyDelete0413 937 128 or Motionalysis@gmail.com
Great post!!Thanks for sharing it with us....really needed. EXPANDO is an expansive mortar chemical that cracks rocks and concrete. It is a concrete cutting, granite breaking and general demolition solution...Rock & Concret Breaking
ReplyDelete